AI Hosting: Cloud, On-Premises, or Hybrid - What Fits Whom?

AI Hosting: Cloud, On-Premises, or Hybrid - What Fits Whom?

AI Hosting: Cloud, On-Premises, or Hybrid - What Fits Whom?

AI Hosting: Cloud, On-Premises, or Hybrid - What Fits Whom?

Aug 18, 2025

René Herzer

"Where should I run my AI systems?" This question confronts CIOs daily. The answer seems simple: cloud is modern, scalable, and cost-effective. However, AI as the fourth layer of IT architecture brings new requirements that turn traditional hosting decisions upside down.

Why AI Hosting is Different


With traditional software, the hosting decision is usually a matter of cost: cloud for flexibility, on-premises for control. With AI systems, new dimensions are added:

Data residency becomes critical: AI models require continuous access to training data. Where this data may be stored often determines the hosting option.

Compliance becomes complex: An AI system that makes decisions about credit approval or medical diagnoses is subject to different regulatory requirements than a CRM system.

Performance is unpredictable: AI workloads can spontaneously increase tenfold when complex queries are made. Traditional capacity planning fails.

The Three Hosting Options in Detail

Cloud AI: Fast, but with caveats


Advantages:

  • Instant access to GPU capacity

  • Managed services for ML pipelines

  • Automatic scaling

  • No hardware investments

Disadvantages:

  • Data leaves the company

  • Vendor lock-in with specialized services

  • Unpredictable costs with intensive usage

  • Latency with large data volumes

Suitable for: Startups, non-critical applications, prototyping

On-Premises: Control at Any Cost


Advantages:

  • Complete data control

  • Compliance security

  • Predictable costs

  • No dependency on internet connections

Disadvantages:

  • High initial investments

  • Complex hardware management

  • Limited scalability

  • Expertise development required

Suitable for: Banks, healthcare, government agencies, companies with sensitive data

Hybrid: The Best of Both Worlds?


Advantages:

  • Sensitive data remains internal

  • Cloud for peak loads

  • Gradual migration possible

  • Flexibility for different applications

Disadvantages:

  • Complex Architecture

  • Data Flow Management Required

  • Dual Expertise Necessary

  • Potential Security Vulnerabilities at Interfaces

Suitable for: Large companies with mixed requirements

The Decision Matrix

Regulatory Requirements


Health data (GDPR Art. 9):
On-premises or certified EU cloud
Financial data (MaRisk, Solvency II):
On-premises with documented exceptions
Personnel data:
Hybrid possible, but with strict separation
Trade secrets:
Dependent on company policy

Technical Requirements


Real-time decisions:
On-premises for minimal latency
Batch processing:
Cloud for cost efficiency
Continuous learning:
Hybrid for flexibility
Experimental projects:
Cloud for rapid iteration

Organizational Factors


Existing expertise:
Cloud when lacking AI know-how
Investment budget:
Cloud for low initial costs
Long-term strategy:
On-premises for strategic AI systems
Vendor preferences:
Dependent on existing partnerships

Practical Decision-Making Aids

Questions you should ask yourself

  1. Data classification: Which of your data may leave the company?

  2. Compliance requirements: Which auditors do you need to satisfy?

  3. Performance requirements: How critical are response times?

  4. Scaling expectations: How much will AI usage grow?

  5. Expertise availability: Do you have AI operations know-how?

Typical Scenarios


Scenario 1: Medium-sized Bank

  • Requirement: Credit risk assessment

  • Decision: On-premises

  • Reason: BaFin compliance, sensitive financial data


Scenario 2: E-Commerce Company

  • Requirement: Product recommendations

  • Decision: Cloud

  • Reason: Scalability, non-critical data


Scenario 3: Pharmaceutical Corporation

  • Requirement: Research Data Analysis

  • Decision: Hybrid

  • Reason: Sensitive research data internal, computing power from cloud

The Hidden Costs

Cloud-Fallen


Data egress fees:
Transferring large datasets can become expensive
Specialized services:
GPU instances quickly cost five-figure amounts monthly
Vendor lock-in:
Migration between cloud providers is complex and expensive

On-Premises Realities


Hardware refresh:
GPU technology evolves rapidly
Expertise costs:
AI operations specialists are expensive and scarce
Underutilization:
Hardware often sits unused

Hybrid complexity


Dual infrastructure:
Costs for both environments
Integration:
APIs and data flows between environments
Security:
Protection of hybrid interfaces

What really works

Start with clear data classification


Before you decide on hosting, categorize your data:

  • Public: Cloud without restrictions

  • Internal: Cloud with encryption

  • Confidential: Hybrid with strict separation

  • Secret: On-premises only

Start with pilot projects


Cloud-First for Experiments:
Test new AI applications in the cloud first
On-Premises for Production:
Operate proven systems internally
Hybrid for Scaling:
Offload peak loads to the cloud

Plan exit strategies


Avoid vendor lock-in:
Use standardized APIs and data formats
Prepare for migration:
Documentation and processes for transitions
Multi-cloud strategy:
Reduce dependencies on individual providers

The strategic dimension


AI hosting is not just a technical, but a strategic decision. It determines:

  • Which AI applications you can actually implement

  • How quickly you can respond to new requirements

  • How dependent you become on external providers

Today's hosting decision shapes your AI strategy for years to come. Don't just choose for today, but for the AI-native organization you want to become.

The question isn't "Cloud or on-premises?" but rather "Which hosting strategy enables our AI vision?" The answer to that is individual – but it should be made deliberately.


This is the fourth part of our series on AI integration beyond pilot projects. Next week: Which AI governance policies you really need and what must be included in them.

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Stay Up to Date

© 2025 basebox GmbH, Utting am Ammersee, Germany. All rights reserved.

Made in Bavaria | EU-compliant

© 2025 basebox GmbH, Utting am Ammersee, Germany. All rights reserved.

Made in Bavaria | EU-compliant

© 2025 basebox GmbH, Utting am Ammersee, Germany. All rights reserved.

Made in Bavaria | EU-compliant

© 2025 basebox GmbH, Utting am Ammersee, Germany. All rights reserved.

Made in Bavaria | EU-compliant