← Guides

SelectionAs of René HerzerCreated with AI

Sovereign AI for local authorities compared

AI is sovereign for a municipality if it can decide where data and AI model are processed, can switch provider and keeps influence over contract and security. Offerings differ mainly in where the model runs, which law the provider is subject to and who may obtain them: state and federal solutions, municipal IT providers, platforms with other providers' models, self-hosting with open source, and platforms such as basebox that run the model themselves.

What does “sovereign” mean for AI in local government?

There is no legal definition. The German federal government refers to the IT Planning Council’s decision on digital sovereignty: it means the ability to perform one’s own role in the digital world independently, self-determined and securely. Three goals belong to this: ability to switch, ability to shape and influence over IT providers. According to its own statement, the federal government checks case by case whether a cloud meets these goals (federal government reply, March 2025).

For a municipality, this translates into four questions:

  • Location: Where is data stored, and where does the AI model compute?
  • Law: Which law is the provider subject to, and does the US CLOUD Act apply?
  • Switching: Can data, settings and applications be taken out again when the contract ends?
  • Operation: Who runs the platform and the model, and is this also possible on your own premises?

The criteria and standards that the federal and state governments have set for their joint platform are described in the guide on the Deutschland-Stack.

What kinds of offerings are there?

Type Examples Where the AI model runs Who can obtain it
State or federal solution F13 (Baden-Württemberg), LLMoin (Hamburg, Dataport), GovGPT (federal government in Austria) F13: within the state with open-source models; LLMoin: according to Hamburg, a model from OpenAI on Microsoft infrastructure in Europe; GovGPT: Federal Computing Centre with technology from Mistral AI Staff of the respective body and administrations reusing the solution
Municipal IT provider KAI from AKDB, Komm.ONE, IT-Kommunal (Austria) KAI: according to AKDB, on infrastructure in Germany; Komm.ONE: offering from neuraflow in the STACKIT cloud Member municipalities, partly via a framework agreement
Platform with models from several providers Langdock, DeutschlandGPT, Kommunen-Chat With the model providers, for example OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or Mistral AI Any organisation with a contract
Self-hosting with open source Open WebUI, LibreChat, F13-OS Wherever the municipality or its provider runs it Any organisation with its own operations
Platform that runs its own model basebox Cloud: on our servers in the Munich-East data centre; server: at your site Any organisation with a licence

Information on other providers is based on their websites and the linked comparisons, as of 11 October 2026.

How do you recognise sovereignty in an offering?

  • Location of the model, not just of storage: Many offerings store data in Germany but send the request to another provider’s model. Ask where each request is processed.
  • The provider’s law: The US CLOUD Act obliges providers under US law to hand over data on official order, even if it is stored in Europe. This also affects models from US providers used through a German platform. More in the guide US CLOUD Act.
  • Switching: Can knowledge bases, settings and applications be exported? What happens to the platform if the provider no longer exists?
  • Operation on your own premises: Is operation possible in the data centre of the municipality or its IT provider, without an internet connection if required?
  • Control: Do permissions come from your account management, and is every use attributed to a person and logged?
  • Procurement: Is there a framework agreement, or is a separate tender necessary?

The full list is in the checklist for evaluating AI providers.

Where does basebox fit in?

  • Location: In the cloud, each organisation gets a separate environment in our data centre in Germany; the AI model runs on our servers in the Munich-East data centre. Alternatively, basebox runs on a server just for you, at your site and, if required, without an internet connection.
  • Model: By default, your data does not go to any AI model from another provider. An external model is only available as a separate app, if you expressly have it set up (app with an external model).
  • Law: basebox is a German company; with the AI model in basebox, the US CLOUD Act does not apply.
  • Switching: After the contract ends, you can export your apps with their instructions, knowledge bases and settings from the cloud for 30 days. basebox is not open source; if basebox becomes insolvent, the code will be published as open source so that customers can continue working.
  • Control: Permissions come from your account management, and every use is logged. Sharing an app shares its documents, never your own access.
  • Connection: Exchange, SharePoint, Nextcloud and network drives are available. Connectors for council information, document management and finance are in progress (“Coming soon” under Connectors).
  • Price: The cloud starts at 5 people at €490 per person per year, list price excluding VAT; the calculator works out any other number.

What do other offerings have that basebox does not?

  • Open source code: F13-OS, Open WebUI and LibreChat can be inspected and adapted. basebox is not open source.
  • Procurement without your own tender: Komm.ONE in Baden-Württemberg and LLMoin for municipalities in Schleswig-Holstein are available through framework agreements.
  • Operation by the public sector: The state, the federal government or a public IT provider runs the solution itself.
  • A choice of many models in one interface, for example with Langdock.
  • Offerings for citizens: for example chatbots on the municipality’s website. basebox is aimed at staff.

What suits whom?

  • State and federal solutions suit you if your administration is among those entitled to use them.
  • Municipal IT providers suit you if your IT is already there and their offering covers your tasks.
  • Platforms with models from several providers suit you if your data may go to model providers and you want to use many models.
  • Self-hosting suits you if you have the staff, hardware and time for operation, updates and proof.
  • basebox suits you if citizen and social data should stay in Germany or on your own premises and you are looking for a ready platform with permissions, apps and logs. More at basebox for local government.

Frequently asked questions

Is an AI offering with a data centre in the EU automatically sovereign?

No. Location is one criterion. Others are the law the provider is subject to (for US providers, the US CLOUD Act), who runs the AI model, whether you can take your data with you when the contract ends, and whether operation on your own premises is possible.

Is there a binding definition of sovereign AI?

No. The German federal government refers to the IT Planning Council's decision on digital sovereignty, with the goals of ability to switch, ability to shape and influence over IT providers. Whether a cloud meets these goals is checked by the federal government case by case; there is no list of approved offerings.

Does a municipality have to put AI out to tender?

That depends on the contract value, on state law and on the procurement route. Some municipal IT providers offer framework agreements through which member municipalities can order without their own tender. The tender generator provides a product-neutral template for your own tender.

Can we obtain basebox through our municipal IT provider?

Yes, if the provider offers it. basebox also runs in the data centre of an IT provider; when operated for third parties, each customer gets a separate environment with its own account management.

Sources

  1. German Bundestag, hib 130/2025: government definition of the term “sovereign cloud” (28 March 2025), federal government reply, printed paper 20/15138 (German) ↗
  2. State government of Baden-Württemberg: AI assistant F13 becomes open-source software (23 July 2025, German) ↗
  3. Hamburg Senate Chancellery: LLMoin as a success model usable nationwide (15 December 2025, German) ↗
  4. City of Hamburg: LLMoin, what happens to my data? (accessed 11 October 2026, German) ↗
  5. AKDB: KAI – Kommunale AI (accessed 11 October 2026, German) ↗
  6. Komm.ONE: Access to a secure AI ecosystem (18 June 2026, German) ↗
  7. Austrian Federal Chancellery: Public AI launches GovGPT for the federal administration (July 2026, German) ↗
  8. Langdock: Enterprise, operating models (accessed 11 October 2026) ↗
  9. DeutschlandGPT: Trust Center (accessed 11 October 2026, German) ↗
  10. GO-ITC: Kommunen-Chat (accessed 11 October 2026, German) ↗
  11. Open WebUI: licence (documentation) ↗
  12. US CLOUD Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2713 (Cornell LII) ↗

This article was created with the help of AI, based on the sources listed. Responsible for the content: basebox GmbH. Not legal advice, no liability. Research as of 11 October 2026.

Cookie settings

This website sets no cookies for analytics or advertising and embeds no tools from other providers. Your browser only stores what is needed to use the site. Privacy policy